Originally Posted by
Mazer
Its less about dominance and more about storyline/tension to me. "needs to lose because she's been too dominant" is not a nuanced look. I think we're on the same page thats its not a stand-alone valid criticism. And certainly not confined to wrestling.
but as far as wrestling....
I think part of the problem, and in fairness to writers-the difficulty, is the fundamental shifts in how we consume wrestling. In a pre-raw era, 9 months of Hogan dominance meant you saw him on a few matches on Superstars a month (not every week), and maybe a Saturday Night's main event or two, and the 2 to 3 PPVs.
Compare that to a multiple segments a week, a PPV a month, etc. Consuming that much without much dramatic tension is tough. An action based TV show, that over the course of a full season doesn't set up significant setbacks or challenging situations gets too predictable.
There is certainly a segment of the fans that goes counter to the "mainstream". Agreed. But I think that there's a bigger segment that just wants more compelling storylines and unpredictability than the SuperCena era. And hell, some kids (and adults) love that wish projection of the hero "always" overcomes.
I , personally, prefer more of the Rock and Austin style bookings to that.