Confirmed by FIFA this morning. 16 groups of three, and there is a rumour going around that draws will be settled by penalty shoot-out.
Just fuck off.
Confirmed by FIFA this morning. 16 groups of three, and there is a rumour going around that draws will be settled by penalty shoot-out.
Just fuck off.
Fifa in corruption shocker.
What is corrupt about this and why is 48 teams a problem?
It's not corruption though is it. They're just pushing through a bill they know won't be questioned by anyone important because there's more money to be made from it.
My only problem with this is that it should be 64 teams.
48 teams is a problem because the quality is further diluted. Only one team will get knocked out from each group in the first round, making it something of a procession for most of the top sides...as I said when this was discussed previously,we're getting to a point where the first round of the tournament proper is essentially just a glorified version of the qualifiers, and will eventually be treated as such with far less interest from fans.
The shoot-out thing better not be true. Not because it will negatively affect England, it's just a stupid Americanisation of the game that fundamentally alters how games are played.
32 is enough teams and three team groups make it very likely that teams can collude to fix a result so they both qualify. I think it's a bad idea.
Of course its corruption. It is all about the new Head of Fifa building up his power base.
Which regions are going to benefit from this? You can guarantee it wont be Europe. Africa and the Middle East/Asia more likely, and the associated bribery/paying for influence that comes with it.
England should just withdraw from Fifa, it needs to be scrapped and started again with proper oversight.
You'll have to explain how it is corruption. There's no deceit involved - FIFA want it to happen and the vast majority of nations want it to happen. They all stand to profit from it - the smaller nations because they have a better chance of qualifying, the bigger nations because there are more potential matches to profit from. It's all about money but it's not corrupt.
Its not corruption at all. Its just about money and quite openly so.
And Europe will benefit as there will be a larger number of UEFA teams who qualify.
Where there is a lot of money, there will always be corruption, particularly in an organisation like Fifa.
Have the Blatter years taught you nothing? Your statement is incredibly naïve.
With three team groups the last match is often played with both teams knowing which result will see them both go through. If that score is then achieved there is no benefit for either team to keep competing (e.g. the disgrace of Gijon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disgrace_of_Gij%C3%B3n)
But the decision isn't corrupt. The decision is actually wanted by the majority because it will make the majority more money for the reasons Simon explained above.
It's probably going to work out worse for us as fans but for the nations and organisations (FIFA, UEFA, CONCACAF etc) it'll be much more beneficial.
The smaller countries will earn revenue and income from being at the world cup, and likewise the executives at the top of FIFA will receive a kick back for providing more places to qualify. How do you think this vote has been orchestrated. No one in their right mind would want an extended world cup. Just look at the Champions League, no-one gives a toss about the group stages. That is what will happen to the world cup.
Look at the world cup bidding process for goodness sake, that has been corrupt since time began!
Obviously there is going to be corruption involved at some stage in the proceedings, it's FIFA...but we're talking about the decision to expand the competition - which is not itself corrupt because it doesn't need to be, there's no one of importance pushing against the decision.
Apart from the fans, the media, probably a lot of the European countries...