In some form or fashion they would be double dipping profits. The only way they truly lose out in the short term is if no one ended up buying the PPV and people saw no value in the library on the Network and dropped it. The reason they’d shift the PPVs from the Network to another platform is because that company with the platform is paying them to move, so it’s more than likely a profit regardless. It’s just a matter of how long the deal is in place with that platform in terms of their leash. Either way, it’s hard to imagine this is sustainable based on what they’re providing their audience and alternatives.
The only major saving grace is they better realize they have to make their program better to incentivize people to pay more. If they make it better, then that entices people to pay up. If it’s the same product as now as they ask for more money, they’re barking up the wrong tree.
Last edited by BGMaverick; February 7th, 2020 at 4:31 PM.
They can't be thinking of any model where the ppvs cost a lot or aren't available on the network.
The ppvs have been 10 dollars for years now and came with a vault of content. Nobody is going to pay old fashioned prices for today's sub par content.
And losing ppvs would kill the network. Everyone says they subscribe for the vault but lose the ppvs and watch that lie crumble.
I do enjoy the vault but if they jack up the PPV prices as well as putting them off the Network then![]()
![]()