Sorry for the late response, but I thought Carlito's Way was incredibly generic. If it weren't Al Pacino in the lead role it would be another wanna-be street redemption story. I predicted every single story arc when I first saw it.
How is it generic? It re-invents the gangster to a certain extent, and bascially shows that how much you want to escape such a lifestyle, it can almost prove impossible at times.
It doesn't take a simple rise and fall focus point that so many other gangsters do, it takes a re-entry into society and what is basically a fall, which is more or less out of the gangsters hands this time around, which is quite different to the norm.
Last edited by Cactus Lem; June 26th, 2008 at 5:07 AM.
My wife and I watched Candy starring Heath Ledger last night. Pretty good flick. Both Ledger and the lead chick (forget her name) did very good jobs, really played their parts well. The film did a great job showing the power of addiction and the effects it can have on people financially, emotionally, and physically. And despite them being addicts making poor choices, you still cared about them and felt their pain as the story went along, and wanted them to work things out, get clean, and be together.
I did think it kind of funny that their first line of work to earn money for the drugs was prostitution, unlike in Requiem for a Dream, where it was the girl's last choice, but I guess there's probably a reason for that.
Also, I didn't really feel that sad at the end when they ended up parting ways....mainly because I didn't fully understand Heath's last line...something about a reprieve and how thin it is? Anyone who's seen it, can you clear this part up for me? I'm guessing it has something to do with her getting clean, and him not being able to.
I just watched a film called Maria Full of Grace. I found it in the deep, dark shadows of my movies folder when looking for a film to watch with the missus that neither of us had seen before. I couldn't remember why I downloaded it or what it was about but it turned out to be a really good film. It's about a Columbian girl who becomes a Mule (somebody who smuggles drugs by digesting them) and it all goes a bit wrong. Nice little drama.
I found a few more films I have no recollection of downloading in the same folder so I'm hoping a few of those will be good too. The only title I recgonise out of them is Volver, which is that Penelope Cruz film I think. Might watch that tonight too, tis worth it just for the beauty of Cruz.
Has anyone seen The Assasination of Jesse James By the Coward Robert Ford?
Me and my brother started watching it last night, but just couldn't get through it. It wasn't particularly a bad film or anything, and I usually love films with deep character development and study, but this was just way to dull and way to subtle to keep us interested, and after an hour and a half we gave up.
Brad Pitt's Jesse James just didn't interest either us at all, Pitt wasn't exactly amazing in the role, and as the lead actor he just didn't have me hooked, which I saw as a massive fail. Cassie Afleck's character who was actually very interesting, and very good in the role of Robert Ford, just wasn't enough to keep me involved, especially since there was a 25 minute half hour period in which he wasn't featured.
Visualy the film can't be faulted, and I liked the feeling that some of the setting was able to translate, such as the claustraphobia of the train, or the isolation of some of the old west, but overall, the film in my opinion needed something more dramatic to keep me involved. It seemed like it was desperatley trying to stray away from any sort of Hollywood dramatic moment in order to be different. But I feel that that this hurt it massivley as it was just way to quiet, and at times scenes that didn't seem overly significant seemed to drag.
or live long enough to see yourself become a dumdum.
Posts
27,458
Mentioned
199 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)
Rep Power
1682607
The Assassination of Jesse James was, far and away, my favorite film of last years litter.
It's a beautiful film. Not vibrant in it's beauty, though. It's not very vivid at all, and everything looks very dense. Brad Pitt looks absolutely ghostly during parts of the film. The scenes are set up very well, and the imagery is eerie, at times. Especially the winter moments. It's not action packed or particularly modern, like 3:10 to Yuma was. It's very reminiscent of older westerns; the commanding landscapes, the wandering passage of time, the perpetual loneliness. I loved it.
It plays into the legend of James without sacrificing the character development of his final months. They could've easily played up the gunslinger cowboy angle to get some extra box office, but they didn't at all. Every death in the movie is particularly methodical and gruesome.
Everybody in the cast is really strong. Sam Rockwell was awesome as Robert's brother Charlie, and made me forget he wasn't a complete dope. Casey Affleck put in another really solid role to go along with his Gone Baby Gone performance. But I absolutely adored Brad Pitt here. He captures some mystique for James. I watched every move he makes. The way he walks, what he's wearing, how he says what he says. It's a larger than life character, but not in the traditional sense, like some epic roles were(Charlton Heston as Moses, for example). It was a intensely reserved take, where you had to see him through the eyes of Robert Ford, as a celebrity before there really was such a thing.
I suppose if the arch of the story didn't grab you, it'd come off as pretty flat and uninspired, but being a fan of those stylish mood westerns, I fell in love. The biggest complaint about the film is definitely it's length. Nearly every critic that spoke ill of it said it had all the components of a wonderful film, but was stretched out beyond it'd boundaries for the sake of style and mood. I can definitely see where they're coming from, and why that would put some people off, but I watched the film almost like you'd read a piece of literature, which really makes quite a bit of sense here.