User Tag List

Page 3 of 94 FirstFirst 12345133353 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 934

Thread: WWE Survivor Series - November 19th 2017

  1. #21
    Main Eventer
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    9,392
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    19466
    I would be cool with the match without Slater/Rhyno and Fashion Police.

  2. #22
    Top Hulkamaniac Bluegunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Parts unknown
    Posts
    4,644
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    2291
    Quote Originally Posted by Donald View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'd like to see:

    Team RAW

    Brock - Universal Champion
    The Miz - IC Champion
    Ambrose and Rollins - Tag Champions

    Team Smackdown

    Jinder - WWE Chamion
    Baron Corbin - US Champion
    Usos - Tag Champions

    Or put Baron in a elimination match against a team with Braun on it so Braun can get his revenge from the Rumble.

    I always preferred 4 on 4 rather than 5 on 5.
    Problem with this is the rest of the card will suck unites we go back to old school format with all ss matches.

  3. #23
    Main Eventer
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    9,392
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    19466
    How is that even true? There are so many other guys. Styles, Nakamura, Owens, Zayn, Strowman, Joe, Orton, Rusev. You think the roster only consists of champions?

  4. #24
    31172-006 Receipt #11 Rev Donald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Touchable
    Posts
    11,688
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    63723
    uzbekistan
    I would absolutely love to see another 1990 Survivor Series style card, with the winners of each match facing each other in a final match.

    The roster is so stacked with talent that I believe they could pull this off. And name the teams too. Dean's Dudes. The Maharaj Maniacs. Strowman's Strongmen.

  5. #25
    World Champion
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    14,960
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    47268
    Always thought the Grand Finale Match (or something like it) was a good idea. I'd probably do a Battle Royal instead of another tag match, and the winner gets something. The #30 spot in the Royal Rumble, a world title shot, an open contract for a match against anyone they want, something. The issue Survivor Series has always run into is the fact that the winners of the matches don't get anything. It was fine to sell the show back in the early days just on the promise that top guys were going to wrestle each other but today we get that on TV every week.

  6. #26
    BREAK IT DOWN Spedizzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    3,723
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    9544
    Quote Originally Posted by Donald View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I would absolutely love to see another 1990 Survivor Series style card, with the winners of each match facing each other in a final match.

    The roster is so stacked with talent that I believe they could pull this off. And name the teams too. Dean's Dudes. The Maharaj Maniacs. Strowman's Strongmen.
    You might have won the award for best avatar of all time. I am jealous I did not find it first.

  7. #27
    Main Eventer
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    9,392
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    19466
    Quote Originally Posted by The Law View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Always thought the Grand Finale Match (or something like it) was a good idea. I'd probably do a Battle Royal instead of another tag match, and the winner gets something. The #30 spot in the Royal Rumble, a world title shot, an open contract for a match against anyone they want, something. The issue Survivor Series has always run into is the fact that the winners of the matches don't get anything. It was fine to sell the show back in the early days just on the promise that top guys were going to wrestle each other but today we get that on TV every week.
    the grand finale match is kind of silly though. the heels on one side vs the faces doesn't really make sense. Prichard is on record for hating that it wasn't a battle royal

  8. #28
    Wolfpac Nash Diesel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Dead Moines, IA
    Posts
    24,703
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    81115
    Quote Originally Posted by PurePlayer View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    the grand finale match is kind of silly though. the heels on one side vs the faces doesn't really make sense. Prichard is on record for hating that it wasn't a battle royal
    Back in that era though it was perfectly understandable. Why would the heels team up with the babyfaces? But I also get the point of, why wouldn't they make it a battle royal for just 1 survivor? The answer: Gotta make Hogan and Warrior look super strong baby.

  9. #29
    Main Eventer
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    9,392
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    19466
    For sure, I mean in this era it wouldn't make sense since heels and faces team up all the time now in these multi man matches.

  10. #30
    Wolfpac Nash Diesel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Dead Moines, IA
    Posts
    24,703
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    81115
    The only time they really team up is if it's a brand situation and that's only been the last year. I can't really think of too many Survivor Series matches that weren't brand v. brand matches that had a mixed bag.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •