Yeah that looks about right IMO.
Genuinely if we do a 16 or 18 team league with that structure there will be very good players still available in the bottom half of round three.
The way you see it is you get both the 1st draft, your choice of keeper and then the first euro draft?
Or are we back to euro anytime before 3rd
Everyone gets a keeper, that's not any more of an advantage to any particular person.
Weird that you're criticising me for proposing something that's been in place without dispute for like ten years. I'm actually proposing something to reduce reward, I just don't think it should be eliminated entirely.
The bottom teams have some good players they could keep, I didn't bother last year. And as mentioned, if there's keepers and Euro players in play and round 2 goes 1-20, there'll be some keeper-worthy players available for draft in round 2.
That doesnt matter! They generally will still not be as good as the ones at the top.
I am all for rewarding people who do well the season before. Rewarding them 3 times is the issue.
But what I'm saying is that if people take up the reward of Euro players and keepers, it means very good players will be available in the equivalent draft positions, especially if we reduce the league.
And as UK Blue and others have pointed out, it really doesn't matter anyway. Drafting is often shite, Euro players bomb, people get injured. It's really not that hard for someone at the bottom to get to the top if they're active, regardless of any supposed advantage.
Well Griffiths is gonna serve me very well as my keeper!